<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Ultimate Gambit &#187; Review</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.ultimategambit.com/category/review/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.ultimategambit.com</link>
	<description>My little slice of home on the web</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 21 Jul 2011 12:57:12 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Doctor Who: City of the Dalek&#8217;s Review</title>
		<link>http://www.ultimategambit.com/2010/06/15/doctor-who-city-of-the-daleks-game-review/</link>
		<comments>http://www.ultimategambit.com/2010/06/15/doctor-who-city-of-the-daleks-game-review/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Jun 2010 07:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Andy</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Gaming]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Review]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[TV]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ultimategambit.com/?p=286</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Originally Written for Cultural Wormhole Doctor Who: City of the Daleks is an interesting game to review. On one hand it&#8217;s a stand alone game, perfectly adept at holding its own, yet on the other, it opens itself up to be seen as an episode fitting into the middle of the season five TV series. [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><em>Originally Written for <a title="Cultural Wormhole" href="http://culturalwormhole.blogspot.com/2010/06/doctor-who-city-of-daleks-game-review.html" target="_self">Cultural Wormhole</a></em></p>
<p>Doctor Who: City of the Daleks is an interesting game to review. On one hand it&#8217;s a stand alone game, perfectly adept at holding its own, yet on the other, it opens itself up to be seen as an episode fitting into the middle of the season five TV series. On top of this conundrum there is also a need to review it differently from different sides of the ocean. From a British perspective, the game is a freebie, thanks to our television licence fees, but for anyone reading this in the States, you&#8217;re unfortunately going to have to pay for it!</p>
<p style="text-align: center;"><a href="http://www.ultimategambit.com/uploads/DWadventure.jpg"><img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-287" title="City of the Daleks" src="http://www.ultimategambit.com/uploads/DWadventure.jpg" alt="Amy's ready for the 100m sprint..." width="348" height="196" /></a></p>
<p>So with this in mind, the first thing that needs saying about City of  the Daleks is that it&#8217;s easy. Very easy. The game is clearly aimed at  providing something that anyone can pick up and play, which fits the  Doctor Who business model nicely; fun for all the family. But if you&#8217;re  looking for a challenging game, then move on!</p>
<p>For all intents and purposes, the game is a point-and-click adventure allowing you to take the role of the Doctor, and at certain sections his trusty companion Amy. Combining items and progression is mostly carried out through a series of mini-games, either involving careful negotiation of mazes in a similar manner to the old buzzer games, or matching symbols that slowly scroll across the screen. These are not especially hard, and are actually more of a distraction from the interesting stuff than anything challenging. Apart from these mini-games (which begin to get a bit repetitive as you move through the game) the bulk of the action takes place in avoiding the watchful gaze of the Daleks. This is initially challenging (and unforgiving &#8211; being seen means instant death), but as your progress you learn how to stay out of sight with relative ease. I think I may have died three times throughout the game. Thankfully the game itself is incredibly forgiving, and you will find yourself having to repeat two minutes worth of previous action at most, since the game saves checkpoints at practically every room entrance or any action taken. As I said, this is a game aimed at the whole family.</p>
<p>The real interest in City of the Daleks however is the story. Without going into spoilers, the story revolves around the Daleks having destroyed Earth in the 1960&#8242;s and only one man left to save the planet&#8230; Not exactly original as Doctor Who stories go, but still enjoyable and, importantly, in keeping with cannon. The visuals are spot on, with the character models looking exactly as they should, and even the movements seem to match those of the original actors.</p>
<p>It is also worth noting that the game defaults to the most basic graphics settings to ensure it works on all but the oldest PCs, yet you will see a vast improvement if you can afford to run at the higher settings. The voice acting is performed by the original cast, and includes a few genuine laugh-out-loud moments of banter between the Doctor and Amy. This is probably the game&#8217;s strongest asset.</p>
<p>As a member of season five, City of the Daleks fits the tone nicely, and is certainly a welcome addition, however this being said, it is missable. It adds nothing of grandeur to the story, no insights into character that you wouldn&#8217;t otherwise get, and nothing that you&#8217;re going to want to tell your friends about. The length of the episode is touted at around two hours, but in reality it took me a little under an hour; right on par with the length of a TV episode. To be honest, this is just about right; any longer and I think I&#8217;d have been bored of the rinse and repeat actions that you have to take throughout the game.</p>
<p>In conclusion, City of the Daleks is a fun hour-long distraction, but not a whole lot more. If you crave a bit more Doctor Who, and have always wanted to play with a sonic screwdriver, then you&#8217;re going to want to play this, but if you are looking for a new game that&#8217;s going to provide a challenge and replay value then you may want to look elsewhere. There are collectibles that you can pick up throughout the game, which provide interesting facts about the Doctor Who universe, but you&#8217;ll probably get all these on the first play through, and the story isn&#8217;t deep enough to bring you back again.</p>
<p>However, there is a very large redeeming feature of the game; if you&#8217;re a fan in the UK, for the price of £0 you can&#8217;t go wrong and it&#8217;s hard not to recommend giving it a try. On the other hand, if you&#8217;re reading this anywhere else I&#8217;d consider your purchase carefully &#8211; as far as I&#8217;m aware there&#8217;s no word on pricing yet, but I think if I&#8217;d paid more than $5 for it I&#8217;d be a little disappointed. Hopefully episode two will provide some more variety in the puzzles and a slightly deeper story to warrant the fans taking time to play it, but in the meantime, I will look forward to it with baited breath.</p>
<p><strong>Score: 6 out of 10</strong></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.ultimategambit.com/2010/06/15/doctor-who-city-of-the-daleks-game-review/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Steam Report &#8211; new website launch</title>
		<link>http://www.ultimategambit.com/2008/04/30/steam-report-new-website-launch/</link>
		<comments>http://www.ultimategambit.com/2008/04/30/steam-report-new-website-launch/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Apr 2008 19:34:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Andy</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Gaming]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Review]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gambituk.com/2008/04/30/steam-report-new-website-launch/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I know that there are a few gamers who read my blog, so I want to point out a brand new site that myself and John Griffin have launched: SteamReport.com. To quote the site, Steam Report: &#8220;aims to be the foremost place for news, releases, patches, updates and editorials centered on everyone’s favorite platform; Steam.&#8221; [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://www.ultimategambit.com/uploads/2008/04/sr.jpg" class="alignleft" alt="Steam Report" />I know that there are a few gamers who read my blog, so I want to point out a brand new site that myself and <a href="http://www.johng.co.uk" title="Johno Blog">John Griffin</a> have launched: <a href="http://www.steamreport.com" title="Steam Report">SteamReport.com</a>.</p>
<p>To quote the site, Steam Report:</p>
<p>&#8220;aims to be the foremost place for news, releases, patches, updates and editorials centered on everyone’s favorite platform; <a href="http://www.steampowered.com/" title="Steam">Steam</a>.&#8221;</p>
<p>If you use Steam, or even if you don&#8217;t (you should be), check it out. We appreciate any support in the launch of this new venture!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.ultimategambit.com/2008/04/30/steam-report-new-website-launch/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>2007: The Years Best Games rundown</title>
		<link>http://www.ultimategambit.com/2008/01/03/2007-the-years-best-games-rundown/</link>
		<comments>http://www.ultimategambit.com/2008/01/03/2007-the-years-best-games-rundown/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Jan 2008 19:42:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Andy</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Gaming]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Review]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tech]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gambituk.com/2008/01/03/2007-the-years-best-games-rundown/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Before I go any further, I want to state that these are my best games of 2007. I am not saying that they are necessarily the best over all, but they are the games that I have played and enjoyed the most this year. There is a severely limiting factor in this &#8211; I don&#8217;t [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Before I go any further, I want to state that these are <strong>my</strong> best games of 2007. I am not saying that they are necessarily the best over all, but they are the games that I have played and enjoyed the most this year. There is a severely limiting factor in this &#8211; I don&#8217;t own an Xbox 360. The reason this is limiting is that I am pretty certain that there would be <em>at least</em> 2 games that would make my list had I been able to play them &#8211; Mass Effect and Assassins Creed. However, I cant comment, as I haven&#8217;t played them.</p>
<p>So, without further ado&#8230; My top 5 games of 2007:</p>
<p><strong>1. Team Fortress 2<br />
</strong></p>
<p style="text-align: center"><img src="http://www.gambituk.com/images/games2007/tf2.jpg" alt="Team Fortress 2" height="247" width="430" /></p>
<p>So the winner is&#8230; <a href="http://orange.half-life2.com/tf2.html" title="Team Fortress 2">TF2</a>! I decided to separate out the <a href="http://orange.half-life2.com/" title="Orange Box">Orange Box</a> since it is a collection of distinct games that can be purchased individually. Team Fortress 2 is by far my most consistently played game, and I would really struggle to put anything else here. It&#8217;s high paced action that is simply the most fun that can be had on the net. Now all I have to do is wait for the <a href="http://www.joystiq.com/2007/12/22/team-roomba-perfects-the-art-of-team-fortress-2-griefing/" title="Tean Roomba greifing">Team Fortress 2 Quiz</a> Mod to come along <img src='http://www.ultimategambit.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p align="center">______________________________________</p>
<p><strong>2. Super Mario Galaxy</strong></p>
<p style="text-align: center"><img src="http://www.gambituk.com/images/games2007/mariogalaxy.jpg" alt="Mario Galaxy" height="180" width="430" /></p>
<p>I am in a unique position when it comes to Mario. I&#8217;ve played the originals, but I never got around to playing the highly acclaimed <a href="http://www.nintendods.com/sm64ds/final/" title="Mario 64">Mario 64</a> (in any of its incarnations), and while I look forward to it on my DS (when <a href="http://www.amazon.co.uk" title="Amazon">Amazon</a> finally get them in stock), it managed to pass me by. Bring on <a href="http://www.supermariosunshine.com/" title="Super Mario Sunshine">Sunshine</a>, which try as I might, I totally didn&#8217;t enjoy. So my hopes weren&#8217;t high for Galaxy. I watched the trailers and unlike some people, wasn&#8217;t blown away. But it&#8217;s Mario. And it&#8217;s an Nintendo console. So I had to get it. And, having collected 87 stars and well on my way to finishing <a href="http://wii.nintendo.com/software_mariogalaxy.jsp" title="Mario Galaxy">Super Mario Galaxy</a>, I can say that is is the most fun that you can have with a plumber. Period. And the most fun on the Wii. Very deserving of the second place.</p>
<p align="center">______________________________________</p>
<p><strong>3. Portal</strong></p>
<p style="text-align: center"><img src="http://www.gambituk.com/images/games2007/portal.jpg" /></p>
<p>Do I really need to say anything about <a href="http://www.whatistheorangebox.com/portal.html" title="Portal">Portal</a>?! All you need to know is that the cake is a lie. Oh, and it&#8217;s the best, most puzzling 4 hours of you&#8217;re life that you&#8217;re likely to have. I&#8217;d say that I wish it was longer, but I think if it had been, the game would have lost its charm. Thank god that there are lots of people developing <a href="http://www.portalmaps.net/" title="Portal Maps">custom maps</a> to keep us going. Long live the weighted companion cube!</p>
<p align="center">______________________________________</p>
<p><strong>4. Bioshock</strong></p>
<p style="text-align: center"><img src="http://www.gambituk.com/images/games2007/bioshock.jpg" alt="Bioshock" height="180" width="430" /></p>
<p><strong><br />
</strong><a href="http://www.2kgames.com/bioshock/" title="Bioshock">Bioshock</a> must be the most talked about game of the year, and when it&#8217;s as good as it is, why not?! I must admit, I still haven&#8217;t finished it, but my first new year&#8217;s resolution is to get my ass in gear and get to the end. I think a key word when describing Bioshock is the atmosphere &#8211; you really do feel like you&#8217;re there. My only complaint is that there&#8217;s no Anti-Aliasing, but that&#8217;s the Unreal Engine&#8217;s fault, and not Bioshock.</p>
<p align="center">______________________________________</p>
<p><strong>5. Zack &amp; Wiki: Quest for Barbaro&#8217;s Treasure</strong></p>
<p style="text-align: center"><img src="http://www.gambituk.com/images/games2007/zackandwiki.jpg" alt="Zack and Wiki" height="178" width="431" /></p>
<p><strong><br />
</strong>When I started <a href="http://www.zackandwiki.com/" title="Zack &amp; Wiki">Zack &amp; Wiki</a>, I thought I&#8217;d be returning it fairly sharpish, it looked childish and I didn&#8217;t necessarily think it would be my cup of tea. However, after playing the first level I realised that at it&#8217;s heart it is a modern day recreation of the <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gobliiins" title="Gobliiins">Gobliiins</a> trilogy. Level based puzzlers, that have humor and fun combined with lateral thinking. If you haven&#8217;t played it, don&#8217;t knock it until you have!</p>
<p align="center">______________________________________</p>
<p><strong><u>Honorable Mentions</u></strong><br />
<a href="http://www.residentevil.com/" title="Resident Evil"> Resident Wii-vil</a> <em>(aka. Resident Evil 4 Wii Edition) </em>- Ok, it was on the Cube, but the addition of some great controls and the fact that I haven&#8217;t played it before give this a mention.<br />
<a href="http://www.nintendo.co.uk/NOE/en_GB/games/wii/links_crossbow_training_6390.html" title="Link's Crossbow Training">Link&#8217;s Crossbow Training</a> &#8211; Not a great game on it&#8217;s own, but combined with the zapper and a couple of friends, this turned into a lot of fun. At a bargain price as well, who can complain?!<br />
<a href="http://www.popcap.com/games/peggle" title="Peggle">Peggle</a> &#8211; Not you&#8217;re traditional game, <a href="http://www.popcap.com" title="Popcap Games">Pop-cap Games</a> have developed a really addictive little game. Download it, play it, buy it. Simple.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.ultimategambit.com/2008/01/03/2007-the-years-best-games-rundown/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>2007: The Years Best (and worst) TV rundown</title>
		<link>http://www.ultimategambit.com/2008/01/02/2007-the-years-best-and-worst-tv-rundown/</link>
		<comments>http://www.ultimategambit.com/2008/01/02/2007-the-years-best-and-worst-tv-rundown/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Jan 2008 12:24:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Andy</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[MMA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Review]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[TV]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2007]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ABC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Atlantis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Battlestar Galactica]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[BBC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bionic Woman]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bones]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Californication]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Call Girl]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dexter]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dirty Sexy Money]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Doctor Who]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Entourage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Flight of the Conchords]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Heroes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Human Weapon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IT Crowd]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Journeyman]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lost]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Moonlight]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mythbusters]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NBC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Oliver]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Oliver Twist]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Psych]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[QI]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Robin Hood]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Saxondale]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Secret Diary]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Secret Diary of a Call Girl]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Spooks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Stargate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Stargate Atlantis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The OC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Top Gear]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tudors]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gambituk.com/2008/01/02/2007-the-years-best-and-worst-tv-rundown/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[So another year comes to an end, another one begins, and we start the whole routine of the previous year all over again. It’s not pretty, but every year brings us plenty of TV to watch, music to listen to and Films to see. With the writers’ strike going on, who can say if next [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p class="MsoNormal">So another year comes to an end, another one begins, and we start the whole routine of the previous year all over again.<span>  </span>It’s not pretty, but every year brings us plenty of TV to watch, music to listen to and Films to see. With the <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2007_Writers_Guild_of_America_strike" title="Writer's Strike">writers’ strike</a> going on, who can say if next year is going to be the same, but this year was certainly entertaining.</p>
<p class="MsoNormal">And therefore, before further ado, I am going to present you with my picks from last year!</p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><strong><u>Best Show:</u></strong> <a href="http://www.bbc.co.uk/doctorwho/" title="Doctor Who Official Site">Doctor Who</a></p>
<p style="text-align: center"><img src="http://www.gambituk.com/images/tv2007/drwho.jpg" alt="Doctor Who" height="300" width="460" /></p>
<p class="MsoNormal">This was a tough one, but for me, Doctor Who had it’s best season yet this year. David Tennant just <strong>is</strong> the Doctor, and Martha Jones was the most interesting companion we’ve had to date. Some great episodes, some great guest appearances (Jon Simm anyone?!) and altogether very deserving of this year’s Best Show.</p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><em>Runners Up: </em><a href="http://www.scifi.com/battlestar/" title="Battlestar Galactica">Battlestar Galactica</a> (consistently excellent), <a href="http://www.hbo.com/entourage/" title="Entourage">Entourage</a> (still one of the funniest dramas on TV), <a href="http://www.usanetwork.com/series/psych/" title="Psych">Psych</a> (one that seems to miss many people’s radars, but is still an amazing comedy that deserves a mention), <a href="http://www.radiotimes.com/shows/the-tudors/" title="The Tudors">The Tudors</a> (taking over from where Rome left off, an amazing show in a similar style that is definitely on a par with its spiritual predecessor), <span> </span><a href="http://millionaire.itv.com/millionaire/home.php" title="Who Wants to be a Millionaire">Who Wants to be a Millionaire</a> (after x number of series, this is still the best quiz show on tv) <em>– ok, the last one’s a joke&#8230;</em></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" align="center">_____________________________________________________</p>
<hr />
<p class="MsoNormal"><o:p> </o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><strong><u>Best Newcomer:</u></strong><span><strong> </strong> </span><a href="http://www.five.tv/californication/" title="Californication (Five)">Californication</a></p>
<p class="MsoNormal">&nbsp;</p>
<p style="text-align: center"><img src="http://www.gambituk.com/images/tv2007/californication.jpg" dragover="true" alt="Californication" height="263" width="400" /></p>
<p>Possibly a controversial choice, but Californication was brilliant. Constantly stepping over the line, always enjoyable, and some great performances &#8211; David Duchovny<span>  </span>at his best. If you haven’t seen it, you must – Califonication is in a class of its own.</p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><em>Runners Up:</em> <a href="http://abc.go.com/primetime/dirtysexymoney/index?pn=index" title="Dirty Sexy Money">Dirty Sexy Money</a> (like <a href="http://www.theoconline.com/" title="The OC">The OC</a>, but better, and for adults), <a href="http://www.nbc.com/Journeyman/" title="Journeyman">Journeyman</a> (but has hit an untimely end), <a href="http://alpha.cbs.com/primetime/moonlight/" title="Moonlight">Moonlight</a> (some really bad acting combined with some really good acting, but for some reason this keeps me coming back week after week)</p>
<p class="MsoNormal" align="center">_____________________________________________________</p>
<hr />
<p class="MsoNormal"><o:p> </o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><strong><u>Best Comedy</u>:</strong> <a href="http://www.bbc.co.uk/comedy/saxondale/" title="Saxondale">Saxondale</a></p>
<p class="MsoNormal">&nbsp;</p>
<p style="text-align: center"><img src="http://www.gambituk.com/images/tv2007/saxondale.jpg" alt="Saxondale" height="198" width="396" /></p>
<p>Possibly the hardest category for me to judge, as I’ve been watching some past comedy this year too that can’t win it for this year – Arrested Development and Jeeves and Wooster to name two. <span> </span>I was never a fan of Alan Partridge, but Saxondale is just right on the button. Brilliant show.</p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><em>Runners Up:</em> <a href="http://www.hbo.com/entourage/" title="Entourage">Entourage</a> (comedy or drama?! Who knows, who cares), <a href="http://www.conchords.co.nz/" title="Flight of the Conchords">Flight of the Conchords</a> (musical genius), <a href="http://www.channel4.com/entertainment/tv/microsites/I/itcrowd/" title="The IT Crowd">The IT Crowd</a> (geeky, but brilliant – perfect)</p>
<p class="MsoNormal" align="center">_____________________________________________________</p>
<hr />
<p class="MsoNormal"><o:p> </o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><strong><u>Best Short Series:</u></strong> <a href="http://www.bbc.co.uk/drama/oliver/" title="Oliver Twist">Oliver Twist 2007</a></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><img src="http://www.gambituk.com/images/tv2007/oliver.jpg" class="alignleft" alt="Oliver Twist" height="179" width="140" />A new category this year as there were two series that I really wanted to mention but didn’t fit in anywhere else. Oliver Twist was an adaptation that I was totally going to miss – we’ve all seen the story a million times, who needs another. But the BBC nailed it with this one – the kids were brilliant, and as always Timothy Spall was amazing as Fagin. Definitely one for the DVD boxsets collection.</p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><strong><em>Runner Up:</em></strong> <a href="http://www.itv.com/Drama/contemporary/TheSecretDiaryofaCallGirl/default.html" title="Secret Diary of a Call Girl">Secret Diary of a Call Girl</a> (never been a huge Billie Piper fan, but she was superb in this – hugely entertaining, porn for the masses!)</p>
<p class="MsoNormal" align="center">_____________________________________________________</p>
<hr />
<p class="MsoNormal"><strong><o:p> </o:p></strong></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><u><strong>Best Factual:</strong></u> <a href="http://www.history.com/minisites/humanweapon" title="Human Weapon">Human Weapon</a></p>
<p class="MsoNormal">&nbsp;</p>
<p style="text-align: center"><img src="http://www.gambituk.com/images/tv2007/human.jpg" alt="Human Weapon" height="288" width="432" /></p>
<p class="MsoNormal">It’s interesting, it’s factual, and it has martial arts – what more can you want. The history of all the modern martial arts, and them put to the test by two American Mixed Martial Artists. You learn the culture, you learn the techniques. Great factual TV.</p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><em>Runners Up:</em> <a href="http://dsc.discovery.com/fansites/mythbusters/mythbusters.html" title="Mythbusters">Mythbusters</a> (as usual, though it seems they’re clutching at straws a bit now), Jonathan Ross’s Japanorama (it’s entertaining and interesting – that’s what you want!), <a href="http://www.bbc.co.uk/topgear/" title="Top Gear">Top Gear</a> (not sure this really fits in this category, but still excellent viewing!), <a href="http://www.bbc.co.uk/comedy/qi/" title="QI">QI</a> (Stephen Fry is simply brilliant)</p>
<p class="MsoNormal" align="center">_____________________________________________________</p>
<hr />
<p class="MsoNormal"><o:p> </o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><strong><u>Most Improved:</u></strong> <a href="http://www.bbc.co.uk/drama/robinhood/" title="Robin Hood">Robin Hood</a></p>
<p class="MsoNormal">&nbsp;</p>
<p style="text-align: center"><img src="http://www.gambituk.com/images/tv2007/robinhood.jpg" alt="Robin Hood" height="312" width="560" /></p>
<p class="MsoNormal">I know, I know, what am I thinking?! For those that bothered to stick with this show, it was worthwhile. It doesn’t fit into the other categories since it still isn’t <strong>that</strong> good. But it is entertaining, and brainless. If you want some Saturday night swashbuckling Robin Hood style, and if you turn off your reality filter, Robin Hood does stand up on its own, and it’s enjoyable. And the second<span>  </span>season was much better than the first&#8230;</p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><em>Runners Up:</em><span>  </span><a href="http://abc.go.com/primetime/lost/index?pn=index" title="Lost">Lost</a> (I still thought that this season was the best so far. I wish they’d hurry up and end it still, but it did grip me far more than the last season).</p>
<p class="MsoNormal" align="center">_____________________________________________________</p>
<hr />
<p class="MsoNormal"><o:p> </o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><strong><u>Get your act together:</u></strong> <a href="http://www.bbc.co.uk/drama/heroes/" title="Heroes (BBC)">Heroes</a></p>
<p class="MsoNormal">&nbsp;</p>
<p style="text-align: center"><img src="http://www.gambituk.com/images/tv2007/heroes.jpg" alt="Heroes" height="160" width="524" /></p>
<p class="MsoNormal">This category is for those shows that really were good but need to buck their ideas up. Heroes was still great, but lacked the magic that the first season had. They have apparently realised this and will be sorting it out, so here are my fingers crossed for the New Year&#8230;</p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><em>Runners Up:</em> <a href="http://www.bbc.co.uk/drama/spooks/" title="Spooks">Spooks</a> (most people seemed to love this season. I didn’t. Go back to the old formula – it worked), <a href="http://www.scifi.com/atlantis/" title="Stargate Atlantis">Stargate Atlantis</a> (I still tune in, but it isn’t a patch on SG1. Please get it right)</p>
<p class="MsoNormal" align="center">_____________________________________________________</p>
<hr />
<p class="MsoNormal"><u><span></span><o:p></o:p></u></p>
<p class="MsoNormal">And finally&#8230;</p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><strong><u>Most Disappointing:</u></strong> <a href="http://www.nbc.com/Bionic_Woman/" title="Bionic Woman">Bionic Woman</a></p>
<p class="MsoNormal">&nbsp;</p>
<p style="text-align: center"><img src="http://www.gambituk.com/images/tv2007/bionic.jpg" alt="Bionic Woman" height="241" width="400" /></p>
<p class="MsoNormal">I thought this had a lot of promise. I was wrong. Simply awful TV. Switch Off.</p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><em>Runners Up:</em> <a href="http://www.tv.com/dexter/show/62683/summary.html" title="Dexter">Dexter</a> (still an amazing show, but after one of the best first seasons I’ve ever seen, how could season two really live up to my hype), <a href="http://www.fox.com/bones/" title="Bones">Bones</a> (still dragging out the love interest. Still love the show, but sort it out!)</p>
<p class="MsoNormal" align="center">_____________________________________________________</p>
<p class="MsoNormal">&nbsp;</p>
<p class="MsoNormal">So, that&#8217;s 2007&#8242;s TV for you! Check back later for more 2007 goodness <img src='http://www.ultimategambit.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.ultimategambit.com/2008/01/02/2007-the-years-best-and-worst-tv-rundown/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Darjeeling Limited &#8211; Micro-review</title>
		<link>http://www.ultimategambit.com/2007/10/04/the-darjeeling-limited-micro-review/</link>
		<comments>http://www.ultimategambit.com/2007/10/04/the-darjeeling-limited-micro-review/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Oct 2007 12:35:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Andy</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Movies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Review]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gambituk.com/2007/10/04/the-darjeeling-limited-micro-review/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I was lucky enough to get hold of tickets to a preview screening of The Darjeeling Limited at 20th Century Fox Studios in Soho last night. Directed by Wes Anderson, (of Royal Tenenbaums fame), i was expecting the worst. The Royal Tenenbaums really didnt sit well with me when I watched it, so I was [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://www.ultimategambit.com/uploads/2007/10/darjeeling.jpg" class="alignleft" alt="Darjeeling Limited Poster" />I was lucky enough to get hold of tickets to a preview screening of <a href="http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0838221/" title="The Darjeeling Limited">The Darjeeling Limited</a> at 20th Century Fox Studios in Soho last night.</p>
<p>Directed by <a href="http://www.imdb.com/name/nm0027572/" title="Wes Anderson">Wes Anderson</a>, (of <a href="http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0265666/" title="Royal Tenenbaums">Royal Tenenbaums</a> fame), i was expecting the worst. The Royal Tenenbaums really didnt sit well with me when I watched it, so I was expecting that it would be relatively dull.</p>
<p>Prior to the feature, there was a short called &#8216;Hotel Cevalier&#8217; which on its own, I didnt think stood up to that much, and the best bit was seeing Natalie Portman in the buff! However, once this combined with the main feature it made a lot more sense.</p>
<p>The main feature, starring <a href="http://www.imdb.com/name/nm0005562/" title="Owen Wilson">Owen Wilson</a> and <a href="http://www.imdb.com/name/nm0004778/" title="Adiren Brody">Adrien Brody</a>, was quirky and amusing, with some genuinely laugh out loud moments. Many of the jokes were aimed at the rediculousness of the situation &#8211; americans stranded in India, with absoultely no idea of what&#8217;s going on, and the feelings assoiciated with that situation were conveyed well.</p>
<p>It was and interesting journey, but a journey that started to feel a little bit long towards the end. However, nearly as soon as those feelings arose, the film started to round off and began its journey to the climax.</p>
<p>I dont want to give any more away, but what I will say is that I know this film may not necessarily appeal to many of my friends, and it didnt immediately appeal to me, but if you go in with an open mind there is a lot to enjoy about it.</p>
<p>[rate 4]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.ultimategambit.com/2007/10/04/the-darjeeling-limited-micro-review/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Logitech G11 Keyboard &#8211; illuminating my computer</title>
		<link>http://www.ultimategambit.com/2007/08/11/logitech-g11-keyboard-illuminating-my-computer/</link>
		<comments>http://www.ultimategambit.com/2007/08/11/logitech-g11-keyboard-illuminating-my-computer/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 11 Aug 2007 11:22:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Andy</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Gaming]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Review]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tech]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gambituk.com/2007/08/11/logitech-g11-keyboard-illuminating-my-computer/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I&#8217;m in the process of planning the building of a new computer, and the first item that I have bought, is arguably the least important. However, Scan had the keyboard in its Today Only offer, and I couldnt refuse. So, I am now the proud owner of a Logitech G11 keyboard. And my first impressions [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="/images/G11.jpg" class="alignleft" title="G11 Keyboard" alt="G11 Keyboard" height="167" width="250" /> I&#8217;m in the process of planning the building of a new computer, and the first item that I have bought, is arguably the least important. However, <a href="http://www.scan.co.uk" title="Scan">Scan</a> had the keyboard in its <a href="http://www.scan.co.uk/todayonly/" title="Today Only">Today Only</a> offer, and I couldnt refuse.</p>
<p>So, I am now the proud owner of a Logitech G11 keyboard. And my first impressions are good.</p>
<p>It was a hard decision for me to make, but there were two main features that eventually ended up with me choosing the G11: Backlighting and Macro Keys. There are numerous keyboards that have backlighting &#8211; <a href="http://www.extremetech.com/article2/0,1697,2001578,00.asp" title="Saitek Eclipse Review">Saitek Eclipse II</a> being the main one I was considering &#8211; however, this didnt have any macro keys, and they are a feature that I have used in the past, and couldnt really live without. There are also many boards with macro keys, but this was the only board I found in my price range which had both.</p>
<p>One thing I was scared about losing was my wireless, however, I realised that I don&#8217;t use the wireless functionality all that often, and having recieved the keyboard the wire is plenty long enough!</p>
<p>The backlighting has three modes: low, high, and off &#8211; and is subtle enough not to interfere, but high enough to be useful!<br />
The keys have just about the right feel &#8211; light enough to require little effort, but clicky enough not to feel awful like one of those laptop keyboards! There are a couple of points on the board which don&#8217;t seem to be properly lit &#8211; just above the left shift key (the arrow lights, but the word doesnt), a similar thing on the tab key, and a few tiny discrepancies on other keys, however, none of these stop you finding the keys since at least most of them is lit.</p>
<p>The macro keys (G-Keys) on the whole are great, there are 18 of them and three different banks, so 54 in total and they&#8217;re really programmable. I have noticed a few things that havent been possible, or needed a bit of thinking to get them to work &#8211; you cant give Ctrl-Alt-Delete to a G-key, and you cant directly program them to open a folder. I found a workaround for the latter &#8211; setting it to open explorer with an argument of the folder you want to open, however I couldnt find a way to get Ctrl-Alt-Del to work. You can set timings in the macro&#8217;s, as well as just setting a keystroke, but neither worked (even though it did recognise the keystrokes.)</p>
<p>Finally there are a set of media buttons to control  your various media players. These would be great except for one thing &#8211; they dont seem to work when your media player is in the background. They apparently work with Windows Media Player in the background, but who uses that these days?! Itunes and Media Player Classic both can&#8217;t recognise the buttons when they are in the background, which is, to say the least, a bit of a bummer. With any luck, this will be solved by somebody at some point, but who knows &#8211; it&#8217;s not like the keyboard hasnt been around for a while. (I suppose this could have something to do with the fact that I still have the old logitech drivers installed, but I&#8217;ll comment on this when I get my new computer.)</p>
<p>There are 2 USB ports on the back of the keyboard, although i&#8217;m unsure of how useful these are at the moment. I tried plugging in an Xbox 360 pad, and there wasnt enough power for it. My USB key worked, but at a slow speed. I do currently have the keyboard plugged into a hub, so that could be what&#8217;s causing the problem, but again, I&#8217;ll test this when I get a chance on my new computer.</p>
<p>So, all in all, it&#8217;s a really good keyboard, at a really good price of just over £30 <img src='http://www.ultimategambit.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /><br />
My only regret is that I couldnt stretch to get the G11&#8242;s older brother, the G15, which is identical, but has a programmable LCD screen. The extra £15 is just a little bit too much for me to justify, but if you can stretch to it, I would say it was almost certianly worth it! The keyboard is marketed as a Gaming Keyboard, and after a long stint on Quake3 last night, I can say that it definately responds well in that environment. However it&#8217;s also great as a non gaming keyboard too. You can program macros for different programs too (such as Photoshop), as well as for games, and it types great &#8211; I am using it now, and I love it.</p>
<p>So, now time for my rating: [rate 4]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.ultimategambit.com/2007/08/11/logitech-g11-keyboard-illuminating-my-computer/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Kahuna Mens Skate Style Cuff Watch Review (KDX-5404G)</title>
		<link>http://www.ultimategambit.com/2006/03/25/kahuna-mens-skate-style-cuff-watch-review-kdx-5404g/</link>
		<comments>http://www.ultimategambit.com/2006/03/25/kahuna-mens-skate-style-cuff-watch-review-kdx-5404g/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 25 Mar 2006 17:05:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Andy</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Review]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tech]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gambituk.com/2006/03/25/kahuna-mens-skate-style-cuff-watch-review-kdx-5404g/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Recently, my cheap Casio watch which I have had for the last 2 years broke, and I was forced to get a new one. I decided that I wanted to get something a little more fashionable, but didnt really want to lose out on any of the features that I used on my previous watch. [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div align="center"><a title="Kahuna Watch" href="http://www.gambituk.com/images/watch/watch3.jpg"><img border="0" alt="Kahuna Watch" title="Kahuna Watch" src="http://www.gambituk.com/images/watch/watch3t.jpg" /></a> <a title="Kahuna Watch" href="http://www.gambituk.com/images/watch/watch2.jpg"><img border="0" alt="Kahuna Watch" title="Kahuna Watch" src="http://www.gambituk.com/images/watch/watch2t.jpg" /></a> <a title="Kahuna Watch" href="http://www.gambituk.com/images/watch/watch1.jpg"><img border="0" alt="Kahuna Watch" title="Kahuna Watch" src="http://www.gambituk.com/images/watch/watch1t.jpg" /></a></div>
<p>Recently, my cheap Casio watch which I have had for the last 2 years broke, and I was forced to get a new one. I decided that I wanted to get something a little more fashionable, but didnt really want to lose out on any of the features that I used on my previous watch. After scouring the internet, i came across the <a title="Kahuna KDX-5404G" href="http://www.kahuna.co.uk/watches/closeup.asp?ID=168">KDX 5404G</a>, and after checking the returns policy on the Kahuna Website, I decided to take the gamble, in the knowledge that I could return it if I didnt like it. For a bargainous £29.95 this watch looked excellent value for money in comparison to some other similar style watches.<br />
Since when I was looking I was unable to find any reviews, I thought I&#8217;d write a brief review so that others who may be thinking of buying one of these watches may have more of a clue and feel like they were taking less of a gamble!</p>
<p><span id="more-71"></span></p>
<p>My first impressions of the watch were as expected &#8211; its a nice looking watch, and quite different to anything else on the market. The strap width is not too big, and it fits quite nicely on the wrist. The leather is high quality, and sturdy &#8211; i dont see this breaking any time soon! The only problem somebody may find with the strap is that it isnt that long. I dont think i have a particularally big wrist, but i only have two more holes remaining on the strap, so somebody with a big wrist may find this a problem!<br />
The interface is fairly simple &#8211; there are three buttons &#8211; the first shows the date, the second is the alarm, and the third changes the mode between standard and chronograph. The third button is also used for changing the time and date by holding it in for a few seconds. This was quite different to my old watch, however after a day or so of wearing it i got used to it.</p>
<p>As well as telling the time and date, the watch has an alarm function which can be set relatively simply, and the alarm sound is relatively satisfying <img src='http://www.ultimategambit.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' />  It can also beep on the hour.</p>
<p>The final main feature on the watch is the timer. The timer unfortunately only counts upwards (contdown timer was a feature i used to use on my old watch), however this isnt the end of the world.</p>
<p>On the whole, the watch is incredibly sturdy and robust, and works like a dream. It&#8217;s also comfortable to wear, which is a must for any watch that is going to be worn every day. The only thing lacking from my old watch is the light, which would be useful &#8211; especially with the black screen. However, the fact that it has a black screen means that in the dark, you can just about see the figures and tell the time (so long as you&#8217;re at least a bit awake!!). The only other problem is the fact that the screen is quite easily marked by fingerprints etc (as you can see from the photos about). Again, this isnt the end of the world, and certainly shouldnt put you off buying this watch! My final &#8216;issue&#8217; with the watch is that while it is waterproof to 5 ATM, i would be unhappy taking it in water because of the leather strap. My old watch NEVER used to come off, and i used to wear it in the shower and to bed. This one however comes off every night. I suppose thats probably a good thing really!!</p>
<p>So, in summary:<br />
<strong>Pros: Nice design, strong build, simple interface<br />
Cons: No light (hard to read screen in the dark), easily marked screen, wouldnt fit somebody with a small wrist, no countdown timer.</strong></p>
<p>[rate 4]</p>
<p>Overall, this really is a top watch and I would definately reccommend it as an affordable option for somebody looking for a skate/cuff style watch <img src='http://www.ultimategambit.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.ultimategambit.com/2006/03/25/kahuna-mens-skate-style-cuff-watch-review-kdx-5404g/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

